I know when I’m properly in recovery because I start to
re-engage with the outside world. I know
when I’m not properly recovered when I have time to re-engage with the outside
world. It’s a small window, and we’re
there.
I’m finding myself inquisitive about a few things at the
moment, mostly these three:
- The Paul Kimmage Defence fund
- The Team Sky Tour de France leadership debate
- The Everest Sherpa – “Westerner” brawl
Increasingly I find myself sceptical about third hand sources
of information. I guess that’s one of
the consequences of the internet era; no longer can we be satisfied with
seemingly expert opinion, the outcomes of someone else’s research. Even their well thought out and researched
balanced consideration, however well written, just doesn’t cut the mustard with
me. I’d rather see the stilted writing
of a first hand source or hear an interview, but not just the carefully
selected extracts of an interview. I’ve
become demanding and it’s because the internet makes it seem possible that you
*should* be able to hear it from the horse’s mouth.
There’s a lot of well meaning folk who feel they are somehow
qualified and appropriate to speak on someone else’s behalf. It’s interesting
to think about their motivations. And because there's a lot of hypocrisy and double standards about, maybe I'm just doing the same.
For example, the Team Sky Tour de France discussion seems to
have two possible race leaders, both of whom I suspect understand that the
decision will be down to who is best placed to win the race. There’s a first hand interview with Bradley
Wiggins where he outlines the process as he sees it. There’s no word from Chris Froome. There is, however, his girlfriend’s take on
matters which makes me wince. I suspect
if I acted similarly on behalf of a partner then he’d have every right to be
furious with me for a) assuming he was unable to speak for himself b) making a
fool of myself c) believing that a professionally run organisation would allow
a hysterical woman’s twitter to impact decision making. If someone decided to similarly stand up for
me I’d be bloody furious. After all, I
am a living thinking being, not tied to the apron strings of a man and I think
for myself and speak for myself and choose how to fight my battles. Indeed,
here I don’t even think there’s a battle of words to be undertaken. It’s all
about the legs. Madness I tell you,
Madness. But can you trust a third party
viewpoint? Here you have a pretty
relaxed “G” on the subject G Talks to the Telegraph
I guess the issue which has rattled my cage most has been
the Everest brawl. I hate when
individuals are lumped together in an extraordinary fashion. I don’t like the binary divisions into
“westerners” and “sherpas”. I don’t like
the way it’s assumed that the incident on the mountain has categorised people
and suggested all who belong to either grouping are represented by the
behaviour of a few. It’s stupid.
I have, inevitably looked for original sources. There are language barriers and technology
barriers and this is what I came up with:
Ueli Steck “Westerner” Interview with Ueli Steck
Simone Moro
“Westerner”
Jon Griffith
– source Guardian
Or if you
prefer, this one:
The Sherpas
Viewpoint. Not written by a Sherpa.
I mean, how
mad is this, claiming to be the Sherpas Viewpoint and mostly backing this up
with quotes from an American guide. It
contains this quote “I have pieced together an objective version of events”
which comes across, in my view, as downright arrogant.
All in all,
I don’t have an opinion. I can’t. I’m only hearing one side, and frankly have
in some ways perhaps no more than a passing interest. I am intrigued though by the concept of
cultural differences which may have contributed to this, the ways people react
to threats, what behaviours are acceptable, and the naivety perhaps of people a
bit like me.
Maybe the
Paul Kimmage defence fund can wait for another day ...
This was brought to you by PJ Harvey, and this particular version chosen because hey, I was there that year in Reading.
This was brought to you by PJ Harvey, and this particular version chosen because hey, I was there that year in Reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment